Showing posts with label free speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label free speech. Show all posts

Monday, June 18, 2007

Sir Rushdie: Oh, What a Knight; Late September Back in '88



After authoring numerous acclaimed literary works and displaying a distinct penchant for speaking out against human rights abuses, Salman Rushdie has certainly established himself as a fit recipient of knighthood.






Although not the most acclaimed of his works, The Satanic Verses has perhaps brought most of author Salman Rushdie's notoriety. Upon release in September of 1988 it created quite a ruckus over in Iran. Almost immediately, their Ayatollah Khomeini felt it wise to issue a fatwa, or religious mandate, against Rushdie, stating that any good Muslim should actively seek his death.

Though under constant watch by bodyguards for years, the seriousness of the threat has seemingly worn off. The threat of Iran to civilization still looms though, and interestingly enough it was the controversy over Sir Rushdie that catalyzed the severing of official ties between Britain and Iran many years ago.



Since the fatwa, Rushdie has emerged as a sort of Western pop icon, with editorial appearances on both Real Time with Bill Maher and the Colbert Report, and playing himself on-screen in Seinfeld and The Bridgette Jones Diary.


Perhaps Rushdie's most impressive quality is his unwavering insistence that all people should be free. He has spoken out against the Muslim tradition of forcing women to wear Islamic veils, or niqab, repeatedly, and he also publicly opposes The Racial and Religious Hatred Act of 2006 in England.


As a purveyor of individual freedom and human rights, Rushdie has remained relevant through his articulate speech and eloquence. Certainly, his knighthood will only serve to increase his prominence in the forefront of the battle for liberty, and that, in my view, is heartening.





Congratulations Salman, keep up the good work.



Live Free or Die,
Marc




------------------------------------->




Is this your idea of freedom of speech?




------------------------------------->

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Thought Crimes and Free Speech Restriction





Two burning issues on the mind today. Most likely two more that won't be read because I'm not sure of the effectiveness of this blogging medium, but anyway.




Hate Crime Laws:


"Thoughtcrime does not entail death: thoughtcrime is death."

-1984, George Orwell


A World Government(UN) one



A Federal one




If a person of one race, kills a person from another, how can anyone be sure that there was any racial hate involved. Same goes for gay and straight. Religion on religion. Whatever.



The truth is; the only way that the government can keep us at least in theory equal under the law is to disregard our inborn or learned differences. I guess I'd be classified as a heterosexual white male, but is the judge going to take out one of those paint color comparison cards to see where myself and any other implicated parties are on the skin color spectrum. Come on, can't we get credit for coming a pretty long way civil rights wise.



If you shoot someone, you shoot someone. Are you any more a threat to society because they were a minority, or because you thought that a gun was the right method to solve a problem?




Next Up...Talk Radio:



A few days ago, Trent Lott, got all fed up with talk radio because they're blocking him from grabbing up 12 million new voters, give or take a few million. Of course, we are again talking about illegal immigration.



Good thing it will merely be the backdrop of the argument, because I am bored on the
Bush-Kennedy-McCain debacle.



Ms. Lott says, "Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem." The most interesting thing about talk radio and the legislators problem with it is its freedom granting potential. Except for activities occurring online, talk radio is about the last rational way to get any point across to a large audience. No one will come listen to some wacko on a soapbox, and look how foolish some protesters look.



Think incentives. In order to do this effectively, you will have to shed all conception of morals. So, take a deep breath, and think like a legislator. Wouldn't you like to be the channel which filters the information. Wouldn't you wish that they would call your office instead of disagreeing with you over public airwaves. Of course you do; how else could you downplay the dissent.



Live Free or Die.
Marc









Also, bravo to the French. Nikolas Sarkozy is the man. DOWN WITH SOCIALISM!